22 mag rounds for revolvers
#1
Posted 01 May 2010 - 07:09 PM
Thanks
<><
#2
Posted 03 May 2010 - 05:50 AM
chippinslag, on 01 May 2010 - 07:09 PM, said:
Thanks
<><
If you've never fired a 22 Mag handgun, you're in for an unpleasant surprize! They are LOWD and FLASHY! Shooting without ear protection could easily cost your hearing. I would never consider using one for home defense because firing indoors would likely blind and deafen you at least temporarily. That being said, there are ammo sources that
lesson these risks. Winchester Dynapoints are the most user friendly 22 Mag from a handgun, with Federal 50grs being a close second. For plinking, Winchester WRF are just slightly more offensive than 22LR. 22Mag is a rifle cartridge and from a handgun, they make more noise and flame than a 357 Mag. However,there is no recoil to speak of. I hope this helps.
#3
Posted 03 May 2010 - 06:53 AM
I now have a convertable Single Six but have either 2 or 3 shotshells and 2 or 3 .22WRFs loaded as one of my home defense guns. Being an old 3 screw, I only load 5 and have the hammer on an empty chamber... probably not nesessary when not being carried afield, but old habits die hard.
As for accuracy, nothing is accurate for me in a handgun
Added: BTW, the flash may not bother a welder (chipinslag)
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#4
Posted 03 May 2010 - 03:03 PM
I didn't know much about 22 WRF so I looked it up and was pretty excited about them. I had remembered seeing them in Cabelas. I thought that would be the perfect solution. Called Cabelas up and they are out. Checked Cheaper than Dirt, Midway, etc and now I just can't find any. Man I can't get a break. Then to top it off it appears Winchester isn't making any, only CCI makes them and their's states on the box "NOT FOR USE IN REVOLVERS". Jeez!
I'm starting to think I should have told my Dad he'll just have to settle for a Ruger Single Six. Only thing is he really missed his Colt and that thing was so accurate I don't think a ruger could come close to it in accuracy, although I've never shot a ruger 22.
#5
Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:29 PM
chippinslag, on 03 May 2010 - 03:03 PM, said:
I didn't know much about 22 WRF so I looked it up and was pretty excited about them. I had remembered seeing them in Cabelas. I thought that would be the perfect solution. Called Cabelas up and they are out. Checked Cheaper than Dirt, Midway, etc and now I just can't find any. Man I can't get a break. Then to top it off it appears Winchester isn't making any, only CCI makes them and their's states on the box "NOT FOR USE IN REVOLVERS". Jeez!
I'm starting to think I should have told my Dad he'll just have to settle for a Ruger Single Six. Only thing is he really missed his Colt and that thing was so accurate I don't think a ruger could come close to it in accuracy, although I've never shot a ruger 22.
I believe Winchester still makes them. They make a "run of them" every so often. You want these! They are a very nice step up from 22LR and a pleasure to shoot. Many claim they are very accurate as well! They can be found at gun shows and online for about $35 for a half brick or sleeve of 5 boxes of 50. At $7 per box, the're right in between 22LR and those Dynapoints I spoke about. By the way, they are a downloaded 22WMR round that also have a 45gr lead bullet that is tolerable from a handgun. I suggest you pick up a box or two for now and keep your eyes open for the WRFs. They are out there, don't give up yet
#6
Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:36 PM
chippinslag, on 03 May 2010 - 03:03 PM, said:
here ya' go...... http://www.midwayusa...ring=653***7547***
If you read the specs here, it says the CCIs are "not for use in WRF revolvers"... should be okay in a magnum revolver if you want the hollow point. They are more expensive though. I have a couple bricks of older Winchester reproduction ammo which is not as fast as shown here. This is shown as 1300 fps and I believe the older repro ammo was about 1050, or not as fast as HV Long Rifle. They do show the Winchester and CCI as outof stock, but the CCI is okay to backorder. When Midway says okay to backorder, it means they should have it in stock within 30 days.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#7
Posted 03 May 2010 - 04:46 PM
http://www.grafs.com...productId/19271
I have dealt with them in the past and rate them highly. They don't charge for shipping, but impose a small handeling fee.
Edited by noshow, 03 May 2010 - 07:07 PM.
#8
Posted 03 May 2010 - 07:40 PM
I had a Colt New Frontier with .22 LR and .22 Mag cylinders. Even with the LR cylinder, that gun was LOUD. It must have had a big barrel/cylinder gap.
#9
Posted 03 May 2010 - 08:14 PM
Next step - suppressors.
#10
Posted 04 May 2010 - 04:39 AM
chippinslag, on 03 May 2010 - 08:14 PM, said:
Next step - suppressors.
I'm not so sure about that. The CCI round is a jacketed bullet (.224) while the Winchester is a lead bullet(223) with a copper wash. The possibilities of excessive pressure pose a safety risk in my opinion. Others, more knowlegable, should be able to comment on that. Or you should call CCI.
#11
Posted 04 May 2010 - 12:36 PM
noshow, on 04 May 2010 - 04:39 AM, said:
The revolver in question is a .22 magnum, not a Long Rifle, so it should have the bigger bore than a LR. Nominal bullet size for a WRF and WMR are both .224. Bullet manufacturers sometimes vary a little from nominal for whatever reason. For example, Lapua makes a M or L bullet for their Master and Midas loadings that are .001" different, .2225" vs. .2235" if I recall correctly. .22 Hornet started out as .223 and later changed to .224. Evidently .001" does not make enough difference in pressure. Now, shooting a Magnum or WRF in a LR barrel might, in some equipment, make enough difference to be dangerous. I have a Ruger S/S that was a LR and I have a magnum cylinder machined to fit it. I have not shot, and probably won't shoot, this with magnum bullet loads, but have shot it with magnum shotshells and copper washed WRF bullet loads (see earlier post).
Still, to be sure, it might be wise to check with a competent gunsmith. Checking with CCI might get you a "standard answer" from someone that doesn't really know, but is reading the company's CYA policy.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#12
Posted 04 May 2010 - 03:27 PM
"some gun makers put 22 Long Rifle barrels in the 22 WRF guns,
thus the revolver Warning on 22 WRF as the barrel diameter is smaller in
22 LR. Bullets are larger in diameter in the 22 WRF than in the 22 WMR
and use is not recommended of the 22 WRF in guns marked 22 WMR."
Not very good English but I get his drift. The 22WRF is a larger diameter than 22LR OR 22MAGNUM. I don't understand how this makes their ammo only contraindicated in revolvers and not 22mag rifles as well.
Would the Winchester brand 22 WRF be ok in this revolver?
#13
Posted 04 May 2010 - 04:01 PM
chippinslag, on 04 May 2010 - 03:27 PM, said:
"some gun makers put 22 Long Rifle barrels in the 22 WRF guns,
thus the revolver Warning on 22 WRF as the barrel diameter is smaller in
22 LR. Bullets are larger in diameter in the 22 WRF than in the 22 WMR
and use is not recommended of the 22 WRF in guns marked 22 WMR."
Not very good English but I get his drift. The 22WRF is a larger diameter than 22LR OR 22MAGNUM. I don't understand how this makes their ammo only contraindicated in revolvers and not 22mag rifles as well.
Would the Winchester brand 22 WRF be ok in this revolver?
So what CCI is telling you is their jacketed bullet for the WRF is larger than .224", because that's what a WMR is. The Winchester is not bigger than .224" and being a lead bullet (copper washed) would probably be okay even in a .223" LR barrel... I know I have shot them in a LR barrel. If CCI's bullet is in fact larger than .224", or if your Colt has a LR diameter barrel, yes it could be a problem being a jacketed bullet. I guess I would then also be careful about what magnum load I shot in the Colt if the barrel is for a LR and the magnum bullet is .224". I wouldn't shoot a jacketed bullet that is .224"... lead should still be okay. I guess to be safe, I'd stick with lead and stay away from jacketed WRF or WMR.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#14
Posted 04 May 2010 - 04:19 PM
These are the only WRF or WMRs I have on hand at present. In the interest of time, I only measured a couple of each caliber.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#15
Posted 04 May 2010 - 05:12 PM
Edited by noshow, 04 May 2010 - 05:13 PM.
#16
Posted 11 June 2010 - 11:05 PM
#17
Posted 31 January 2011 - 11:17 AM
#18
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:06 PM
All 3 of these will cut holes on paper through my Tarus Tracker and i rarely ever fire a handgun without ear protection, so that isn't an issue. For plinking fun, the 22mag is a little bigger boom, and even though it isn't cheap anymore its still fun.
#19
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:26 PM
#20
Posted 27 January 2012 - 02:00 AM
By the way, last time I shot it in the field I got a nice fox with it. Worked just fine.
#21
Posted 27 January 2012 - 07:31 AM
Karl.... I don't think its actually the loudness of the report, but it's a "sharper" bang and I would rather shoot my .357 without hearing protection than my .22WMR. The WMR is actually painful to my ears... .30 carbine handguns do the same.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#22
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:51 AM
#23
Posted 27 January 2012 - 11:35 AM
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#24
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:56 PM
Edited by Randymac, 27 January 2012 - 05:14 PM.
#25
Posted 27 January 2012 - 02:36 PM
I actually have a convertable Single Six now, have owned it for probably 20 years and still have not shot it with WMR loads except to test the pattern on shotshells. I have shot some of the lower power re-pro Winchester WRF loads, but they aren't much more than LR rounds, 45 grain bullet at about 1050fps.. I keep the S/S loaded with a pair of shot and 3 solid WRFs as one of my home defense guns... figure a shotshell in the face at less than 10' will hurt.
BTW, I remember reading a test article many, many years ago comparing the WMR HP rounds to ball service .38 Spl. for defense, and the WMR was way more devastating.
I miss Ike....hell, I even miss Harry!!
#26
Posted 27 January 2012 - 03:35 PM
Kmow how people fire a round into the ground and say "one step further and the next ones in you".
I think that it is better to fire one right next to his ear and say "damn, I missed".
#27
Posted 27 January 2012 - 05:21 PM
i have a high standard revolver with both cylinder's, once in awhile i'll buy a box of mags and change cylinder.
Edited by Randymac, 27 January 2012 - 05:22 PM.
#28
Posted 28 January 2012 - 01:20 AM
1 - A firing pin on a loaded chamber that's supposed to be empty.
2 - A firing pin on an empty chamber that's supposed to be loaded.
#29
Posted 28 January 2012 - 04:18 PM
I have a NEA Mini in .22WMR. About the only pistol I own that is that is louder is the 4" Tracker in .44Mag, and I think that's due to the porting. The mini isn't painfull to shoot, but it moves around in the hand and I have to readjust my grip while cocking it after every shot.
Thomas Jefferson
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.
Thomas Jefferson
#30
Posted 07 June 2012 - 08:50 AM
#31
Posted 09 June 2012 - 12:14 AM
noshow, on 03 May 2010 - 04:29 PM, said:
Things never change.
And Rome Fell
CICERO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~55 BC!!
ONCE THE PUBLIC REALIZES THEY CAN VOTE THEMSELVES MONEY FROM THE PUBLIC TREASURY THE REPUBLIC IS LOST..Ben Franklin and others.
#32
Posted 26 June 2012 - 03:37 PM
thus depending on the barrel one could have issues with a wrf that might slip into a wmr chamber [ it should be a tight fit in it] if it will go at all , its likely that a revolver that has a lr & wmr cylinder has a bbl for the wmr , so accuracy with the 22lr should be less , and the use of wrf could result in overpreasure ?????
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










